Close this search box.

European politicians to legitimize constitutional changes in Russia

(July 2, 2020)


Member of the Berlin Parliament Gunnar Lindemann (left) and Member of the German Bundestag Stefan Keuter (right) both from AfD Germany at the all-Russian voting. Source: Facebook account of Gunnar Lindemann, 25.06.2020


Kremlin-friendly foreign politicians, journalists, lobbyists, and activists have once again been invited to praise the disputed “all-Russian voting” on the constitutional amendments proposed by President Vladimir Putin. According to those amendments, Putin will be allowed to run for another two terms and to stay in power until 2036.

The voting took place from 25 June to 1 July. Neither was an OSCE ODIHR observation mission invited to observe the vote, nor were domestic independent observers allowed to be present in the polling stations during the voting. Russian media covered the statements of the foreign politicians, referring to them often as “international observers”, thus creating the false impression of international acknowledgment of the allegedly democratic and transparent “all-Russian vote”.

Among the „observers“ are the Member of the German Bundestag, Stefan Keuter, the Member of the Berlin Parliament Gunnar Lindemann (both from AfD, Germany), Member of the Italian Parliament Paolo Grimoldi (Northern League, Italy),  five French far-right Members of the European Parliament including Thierry Mariani (National Rally, France); the leaders of the Acton Party (Latvia) Jevgenijs Korols and Einārs Graudiņš; Vávra Suk (Nya Tider, Sweden).

Stefan Keuter, compared the “all-Russian voting” to elections in Germany: “You have cameras everywhere, which we do not have in Germany. And it is normal for you when representatives of the opposition are present as observers who control everything”. According to Keuter Russia also demonstrated a “high level of transparency”.

It is important to stress that any international “observers” of this “all-Russian voting” are not part of any official international election observation mission and their statements should not be considered as legitimate assessments of the conduct of the vote.

EPDE repeats its

Subscribe to our

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
and receive the latest EPDE news

Subscribe to our

Sign up for our monthly newsletter and receive the latest EPDE news

We use cookies to optimize our website and our service. Manage your cookie settings here.